ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験問題のヒット率は非常に高く、もちろん合格率も非常に高くなります。製品を選択する前に、独自の合格率を比較しておく必要があります。 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor学習資料は、リストの一番上に表示される必要があります。また、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor学習クイズの合格率は99%です。これは私たちの努力の結果であり、ユーザーへの最高の贈り物です。私たちのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor学習教材は非常に高い合格率を持つことができ、すべてのメンバーが最初に顧客の概念を支持するのは段階的な結果です。 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorトレーニング準備の試用版を使用する場合は、購入することをお勧めします!
PECB事実が語るよりも説得力があることは明らかです。したがって、当社がコンパイルしたISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditorテストトレントを味わうために、このWebサイトで無料デモを用意しました。 弊社Xhs1991がまとめたISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験トレントは、試験に備えるための最高のISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験トレントであると私たちが確信している理由を理解するでしょう。 無料のデモはいつでも好きなときにダウンロードできます。いつでも試してみてください。ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-AuditorのISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam試験の資料は決してあなたを失望させません。
>> ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor復習内容 <<
Xhs1991のPECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験トレーニング資料は最高のトレーニング資料です。あなたはIT職員としたら、Xhs1991はあなたが選ばなくてはならないトレーニング資料です。Xhs1991のPECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験トレーニング資料は絶対に信頼できるもので、IT認証を受ける受験生を対象として特別に研究された問題と解答に含まれているう資料です。 PECBのISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor試験に受かるのはIT職員の皆さんの目標です。Xhs1991の合格率は信じられないほど高いです。Xhs1991はあなたの成功にずっと力を尽くしています。
質問 # 79
Scenario 5 (continued):
Scenario 5: Aizoia, located in Washington, DC, has revolutionized data analytics, software development, and consulting by usingadvanced Al algorithms. Central to its success is an Al platform adept at deciphering complex datasets for enhanced insights. To ensure that its Al systems operate effectively and responsibly, Aizoia has established an artificial intelligence management system AIMS basedon ISO/IEC 42001 and is now undergoing a certification audit to verify the AIMS's effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Robert, one of the certification body's full-time employees with extensive experience in auditing, was appointed as the audit team leaderdespite not receiving an official offer for the role. Understanding the critical importance of assembling an audit team with diverse skills and knowledge, the certification body selected competent individuals to form the audit team. The certification body appointed a team ofseven members to conduct the audit after considering the specific conditions of the audit mission and the required competencies.
Initially, the certification body, in cooperation with Aizoia, defined the extent and boundaries of the audit, specifying the sites (whetherphysical or virtual), organizational units, and the activities for review. Once the scope, processes, methods, and team composition hadbeen defined, thecertification body provided the audit team leader with extensive information, including the audit objectives anddocumented details on the scope, processes, methods, and team compositions.
Additionally, the certification body shared contact details of the auditee, including locations, time frames, and the duration of the auditactivities to be conducted. The team leader also received information needed for evaluating and addressing identified risks andopportunities for the achievement of the audit objectives.
Before starting the audit, Robert wrote an engagement letter, introducing himself to Aizoia and outlining plans for scheduling initialcontact. The initial contact aimed to confirm thecommunication channels, establish the audit team's authority to conduct the audit, andsummarize the audit's key aspects, such as objectives, scope, criteria, methods, and team composition. During this first meeting, Robertemphasized the need for access to essential information that would help to conduct the audit.
Moreover, audit logistics, such as scheduling, access, health and safety arrangements, observer attendance, and the need for guides orinterpreters, were thoroughly planned. The meeting also addressed areas of interest or concern, preemptively resolving potential issuesand finalizing any matters related to the audit team composition.
As the audit progressed, Robert recognized the complexity of Aizoia's operations, leading him to conclude that a review of its Al-relateddata governance practices was essential for compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. He discussed this need with Aizoia's management,proposing an expanded audit scope. After careful consideration, they agreed to conduct a thorough review of the Al data governancepractices, but there was no mutual decision to officially change the audit scope. Consequently. Robert decided to proceed with the auditbased on the original scope, adhering to the initial audit plan, and documented the conversation and decision accordingly.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
According to Scenario 5, was Robert's decision to proceed with the audit without changing its scope appropriate?
正解:B
解説:
Robert acted correctly by proceedingwithout changing the scope, because no official agreement was made to modify it, and he documented the conversation properly.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1specifies that"Audit scope can only be changed if formally agreed by both the auditee and the certification body."
* TheLead Auditor Guidesays:"If the auditee and auditor cannot agree to modify the audit scope, the original scope must remain valid, and deviations should be documented." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.
質問 # 80
An audit team member is tasked with evaluating a sophisticated AI system used for autonomous driving. They lack the necessary expertise but proceed without consulting a specialist. Which principle is being neglected in this scenario?
正解:A
解説:
The principle being neglected isDue Professional Care.
According toISO 19011:2018 - Clause 4(f), auditors are expected to applydiligence, competence, and judgmentduring audit activities. If an auditor proceeds with an auditwithout the required expertise, especially for a high-risk system like autonomous driving, this violates the principle of due care.
ThePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3clearly states that in complex technical environments (such as AI or autonomous systems), auditors mustseek assistance from domain specialistswhen they lack direct experience.
Reference: ISO 19011:2018 - Clause 4(f): "Due professional care"
PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 3: "Auditor Competence and Responsibilities"
質問 # 81
Which step involves reviewing documents and records relevant to the audit scope?
正解:C
解説:
TheDocument Reviewstep is a key part of audit preparation where auditors evaluate relevantdocuments, records, policies, and proceduresto understand the structure and implementation of the AI Management System.
As perISO 19011:2018 - Clause 6.4.3, document review helps auditorsfamiliarize themselves with the management system, identify potential areas of concern, and refine the audit plan.
In AI audits (such as AIMS under ISO/IEC 42001), this may include reviewingAI governance policies, data governance procedures, impact assessments, or model documentation.
質問 # 82
What does the 'Human-Centered Design' core element prioritize in AI development?
正解:D
解説:
Human-Centered Designfocuses on designing AI systems thatrespect and enhance human well-being, align withuser needs and values, and promoteinclusive and accessible technologies.
According toISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clauses 4.2 and 6.1.2, and highlighted throughout thePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1, AI systems should beusable, inclusive, and ethically aligned, especially when intended for diverse or vulnerable user groups.
This principle ensures thathumans remain in control and benefitfrom the capabilities of AI.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 4.2 (Needs of interested parties), Clause 6.1.2 (Ethical impact and risk analysis) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: "Human-Centered Design and Trustworthy AI"
質問 # 83
Scenario 4 (continued):
BioNovaPharm, a German biopharmaceutical company, has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMSbased on ISO/IEC 42001 to optimize various aspects of drug discovery, including analyzing extensive biological data, identifying potentialdrug candidates, and streamlining clinical trial processes. After having the AIMS in place for over a year, the company contracted acertification body and is now undergoing an AIMS audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001.
Adopting a risk-based approach, the audit team focused on risk throughout their activities. The level of detail outlined in the audit plancorresponded to the scope and complexity of the audit. The team employed a ranking system for detailed audit procedures, prioritizingthose with the highest risk.
Once the stage 1 audit began, the audit team started reviewing the auditee's documented information. To assess whether BioNovaPharmcomplies with the legal and regulatory requirements related to incident communication, the audit team examined evidence provided bythe company's external legal office. The evidence confirmed that BioNovaPharm applies the requirements of the EU Al Act, whichmandates that providers of high-risk Al systems report serious incidents to relevant authorities.
Following the completion of the stage 1 audit, John, an audit team member, documented the stage 1 audit outputs, including theobservations of the audit team that could result in nonconformities during the on-site audit. However, the audit team leader, Emma, whowas overseeing the audit activities, observed that John failed to document significant observations related to the lack of transparency inthe Al decision-making processes of BioNovaPharm. Considering that Emma observed John's lack of competence in undertaking some audit activities, a disciplinary note was recorded for John.
Question:
Based on Scenario 4, does the level of detail in the audit plan adequately reflect all aspects recommended for a comprehensive risk-based approach to planning?
正解:A
解説:
The audit plan should correlate directly withthe risk of not achieving the audit objectives, meaning higher- risk areas need more scrutiny.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1 and ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 9.2.1 emphasize that audit planning must berisk-based, addressing critical risk areas sufficiently to meet audit objectives.
* Lead Auditor TrainingModule 3 highlights:"An audit plan must be sufficiently detailed based on risks to ensure critical activities receive proportionate audit attention." Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.1; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1.
質問 # 84
......
PECBご存知のように、競争の激しい世界では、Xhs1991のISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor認定などのソフトパワーを向上させる以外に選択肢はありません。 あなたは転職の状態にあるかもしれませんが、あなた自身のキャリアを持つことは信じられないほど難しいです。 それからあなた自身を改善し、不可能な任務を可能にする方法はあなたの優先事項です。 ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Examガイドトレントがあなたを助けてくれます。 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor質問トレントを使用してv試験に合格し、履歴書を強調することは非常に重要です。したがって、職場で成功を収めることができます。
ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor合格問題: https://www.xhs1991.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor.html
信じないになら、Xhs1991 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor合格問題のサイトをクリックしてください、しかし、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor復習教材を利用すれば、ずべてのことは簡単になります、Xhs1991 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor合格問題質問と回答を購入した場合、一年間の無料更新を保証します、今、我々のISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor最新練習資料は以上の言うように同じではありません、候補者の難問を解決するために、我々はXhs1991 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor合格問題のISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor合格問題 - ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam参考書を薦めます、PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor復習内容 信頼できるアフターサービス、PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor 復習内容 そして、ヒット率が99%に達します。
先程のケースを元々入っていた場所にしまい、博士は楽しそうに吟味していた、カウンターにはお客が行列を作っている、信じないになら、Xhs1991のサイトをクリックしてください、しかし、ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor復習教材を利用すれば、ずべてのことは簡単になります。
Xhs1991質問と回答を購入した場合、一年間の無料更新を保証します、今、我々のISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor最新練習資料は以上の言うように同じではありません、候補者の難問を解決するために、我々はXhs1991のISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam参考書を薦めます。