Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Examcollection Vce | Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Notes

P.S. Free 2025 Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Itexamguide: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wZI3i5fnyW24nPlY9DhS3iCTJ91Hna8R

Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions can meet your needs to the maximum extent, and our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning materials are designed to the greatest extent from the customer's point of view. So you don't have to worry about the operational complexity. As soon as you enter the learning interface of our system and start practicing our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Learning Materials on our Windows software, you will find small buttons on the interface. It is very easy and convenient to use and find.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.
Topic 2	Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal licensing requirements in this topic.
Topic 3	Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.
Topic 4	Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.
Topic 5	Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.

>> Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Examcollection Vce <<

Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Notes | Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Forum

Did you often feel helpless and confused during the preparation of the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam? Do you want to find an expert to help but feel bad about the expensive tutoring costs? Don't worry. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions can help you to solve all the problems. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Material always regards helping students to pass the exam as it is own mission. And we have successfully helped numerous of the candidates pass their exams.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q34-Q39):

NEW QUESTION # 34
A company has a typical RAG-enabled, customer-facing chatbot on its website.

Select the correct sequence of components a user's questions will go through before the final output is returned. Use the diagram above for reference.

A. 1.embedding model, 2.vector search, 3.context-augmented prompt, 4.response-generating LLM
B. 1.context-augmented prompt, 2.vector search, 3.embedding model, 4.response-generating LLM
C. 1.response-generating LLM, 2.vector search, 3.context-augmented prompt, 4.embedding model
D. 1.response-generating LLM, 2.context-augmented prompt, 3.vector search, 4.embedding model

Answer: A

Explanation:
To understand how a typical RAG-enabled customer-facing chatbot processes a user's question, let's go through the correct sequence as depicted in the diagram and explained in option A:
* Embedding Model (1):The first step involves the user's question being processed through an embedding model. This model converts the text into a vector format that numerically represents the text. This step is essential for allowing the subsequent vector search to operate effectively.
* Vector Search (2):The vectors generated by the embedding model are then used in a vector search mechanism. This search identifies the most relevant documents or previously answered questions that are stored in a vector format in a database.
* Context-Augmented Prompt (3):The information retrieved from the vector search is used to create a context-augmented prompt. This step involves enhancing the basic user query with additional relevant information gathered to ensure the generated response is as accurate and informative as possible.
* Response-Generating LLM (4):Finally, the context-augmented prompt is fed into a response- generating large language model (LLM). This LLM uses the prompt to generate a coherent and contextually appropriate answer, which is then delivered as the final output to the user.
Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* B, C, D: These options suggest incorrect sequences that do not align with how a RAG system typically processes queries. They misplace the role of embedding models, vector search, and response generation in an order that would not facilitate effective information retrieval and response generation.
Thus, the correct sequence isembedding model, vector search, context-augmented prompt, response- generating LLM, which is option A.

NEW QUESTION # 35
A Generative Al Engineer is working with a retail company that wants to enhance its customer experience by automatically handling common customer inquiries. They are working on an LLM-powered Al solution that should improve response times while maintaining a personalized interaction. They want to define the appropriate input and LLM task to do this.
Which input/output pair will do this?

A. Input: Customer reviews: Output Classify review sentiment
B. Input: Customer service chat logs; Output Group the chat logs by users, followed by summarizing each user's interactions, then respond
C. Input: Customer service chat logs; Output: Find the answers to similar questions and respond with a summary
D. Input: Customer reviews; Output Group the reviews by users and aggregate per-user average rating, then respond

Answer: C

Explanation:
The task described in the question involves enhancing customer experience by automatically handling common customer inquiries using an LLM-powered AI solution. This requires the system to process input data (customer inquiries) and generate personalized, relevant responses efficiently. Let's evaluate the options step-by-step in the context of Databricks Generative AI Engineer principles, which emphasize leveraging LLMs for tasks like question answering, summarization, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
* Option A: Input: Customer reviews; Output: Group the reviews by users and aggregate per-user average rating, then respond
* This option focuses on analyzing customer reviews to compute average ratings per user. While this might be useful for sentiment analysis or user profiling, it does not directly address the goal of handling common customer inquiries or improving response times for personalized interactions. Customer reviews are typically feedback data, not real-time inquiries requiring immediate responses.
* Databricks Reference: Databricks documentation on LLMs (e.g., "Building LLM Applications with Databricks") emphasizes that LLMs excel at tasks like question answering and conversational responses, not just aggregation or statistical analysis of reviews.
* Option B: Input: Customer service chat logs; Output: Group the chat logs by users, followed by summarizing each user's interactions, then respond
* This option uses chat logs as input, which aligns with customer service scenarios. However, the output-grouping by users and summarizing interactions-focuses on user-specific summaries rather than directly addressing inquiries. While summarization is an LLM capability, this approach lacks the specificity of finding answers to common questions, which is central to the problem.
* Databricks Reference: Per Databricks' "Generative AI Cookbook," LLMs can summarize text, but for customer service, the emphasis is on retrieval and response generation (e.g., RAG workflows) rather than user interaction summaries alone.
* Option C: Input: Customer service chat logs; Output: Find the answers to similar questions and respond with a summary
* This option uses chat logs (real customer inquiries) as input and tasks the LLM with identifying answers to similar questions, then providing a summarized response. This directly aligns with the goal of handling common inquiries efficiently while maintaining personalization (by referencing past interactions or similar cases). It leverages LLM capabilities like semantic search, retrieval, and response generation, which are core to Databricks' LLM workflows.
* Databricks Reference: From Databricks documentation ("Building LLM-Powered Applications," 2023), an exact extract states:"For customer support use cases, LLMs can be used to retrieve relevant answers from historical data like chat logs and generate concise, contextually appropriate responses."This matches Option C's approach of finding answers and summarizing them.
* Option D: Input: Customer reviews; Output: Classify review sentiment
* This option focuses on sentiment classification of reviews, which is a valid LLM task but unrelated to handling customer inquiries or improving response times in a conversational context.
It's more suited for feedback analysis than real-time customer service.
* Databricks Reference: Databricks' "Generative AI Engineer Guide" notes that sentiment analysis is a common LLM task, but it's not highlighted for real-time conversational applications like customer support.
Conclusion: Option C is the best fit because it uses relevant input (chat logs) and defines an LLM task (finding answers and summarizing) that meets the requirements of improving response times and maintaining personalized interaction. This aligns with Databricks' recommended practices for LLM-powered customer service solutions, such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) workflows.

NEW QUESTION # 36
A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with improving the RAG quality by addressing its inflammatory outputs.
Which action would be most effective in mitigating the problem of offensive text outputs?

A. Increase the frequency of upstream data updates
B. Inform the user of the expected RAG behavior
C. Curate upstream data properly that includes manual review before it is fed into the RAG system
D. Restrict access to the data sources to a limited number of users

Answer: C

Explanation:
Addressing offensive or inflammatory outputs in a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system is critical for improving user experience and ensuring ethical AI deployment. Here's whyDis the most effective approach:
* Manual data curation: The root cause of offensive outputs often comes from the underlying data used to train the model or populate the retrieval system. By manually curating the upstream data and conducting thorough reviews before the data is fed into the RAG system, the engineer can filter out harmful, offensive, or inappropriate content.
* Improving data quality: Curating data ensures the system retrieves and generates responses from a high-quality, well-vetted dataset. This directly impacts the relevance and appropriateness of the outputs from the RAG system, preventing inflammatory content from being included in responses.
* Effectiveness: This strategy directly tackles the problem at its source (the data) rather than just mitigating the consequences (such as informing users or restricting access). It ensures that the system consistently provides non-offensive, relevant information.
Other options, such as increasing the frequency of data updates or informing users about behavior expectations, may not directly mitigate the generation of inflammatory outputs.

NEW QUESTION # 37
A Generative Al Engineer is building a RAG application that answers questions about internal documents for the company SnoPen AI.
The source documents may contain a significant amount of irrelevant content, such as advertisements, sports news, or entertainment news, or content about other companies.
Which approach is advisable when building a RAG application to achieve this goal of filtering irrelevant information?

A. Keep all articles because the RAG application needs to understand non-company content to avoid answering questions about them.
B. Consolidate all SnoPen AI related documents into a single chunk in the vector database.
C. Include in the system prompt that any information it sees will be about SnoPenAI, even if no data filtering is performed.
D. Include in the system prompt that the application is not supposed to answer any questions unrelated to SnoPen Al.

Answer: D

Explanation:
In a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application built to answer questions about internal documents, especially when the dataset contains irrelevant content, it's crucial to guide the system to focus on the right information. The best way to achieve this is byincluding a clear instruction in the system prompt(option C).
* System Prompt as Guidance:The system prompt is an effective way to instruct the LLM to limit its focus to SnoPen AI-related content. By clearly specifying that the model should avoid answering questions unrelated to SnoPen AI, you add an additional layer of control that helps the model stay on- topic, even if irrelevant content is present in the dataset.
* Why This Approach Works:The prompt acts as a guiding principle for the model, narrowing its focus to specific domains. This prevents the model from generating answers based on irrelevant content, such as advertisements or news unrelated to SnoPen AI.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A (Keep All Articles): Retaining all content, including irrelevant materials, without any filtering makes the system prone to generating answers based on unwanted data.
* B (Include in the System Prompt about SnoPen AI): This option doesn't address irrelevant content directly, and without filtering, the model might still retrieve and use irrelevant data.
* D (Consolidating Documents into a Single Chunk): Grouping documents into a single chunk makes the retrieval process less efficient and won't help filter out irrelevant content effectively.
Therefore, instructing the system in the prompt not to answer questions unrelated to SnoPen AI (option C) is the best approach to ensure the system filters out irrelevant information.

NEW QUESTION # 38
A Generative Al Engineer has built an LLM-based system that will automatically translate user text between two languages. They now want to benchmark multiple LLM's on this task and pick the best one. They have an evaluation set with known high quality translation examples. They want to evaluate each LLM using the evaluation set with a performant metric.
Which metric should they choose for this evaluation?

A. BLEU metric
B. ROUGE metric
C. RECALL metric
D. NDCG metric

Answer: A

Explanation:
The task is to benchmark LLMs for text translation using an evaluation set with known high-quality examples, requiring a performant metric. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: ROUGE metric
* ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) measures overlap between generated and reference texts, primarily for summarization. It's less suited for translation, where precision and word order matter more.
* Databricks Reference:"ROUGE is commonly used for summarization, not translation evaluation"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
* Option B: BLEU metric
* BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) evaluates translation quality by comparing n-gram overlap with reference translations, accounting for precision and brevity. It's widely used, performant, and appropriate for this task.
* Databricks Reference:"BLEU is a standard metric for evaluating machine translation, balancing accuracy and efficiency"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: NDCG metric
* NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) assesses ranking quality, not text generation.
It's irrelevant for translation evaluation.
* Databricks Reference:"NDCG is suited for ranking tasks, not generative output scoring" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: RECALL metric
* Recall measures retrieved relevant items but doesn't evaluate translation quality (e.g., fluency, correctness). It's incomplete for this use case.
* Databricks Reference: No specific extract, but recall alone lacks the granularity of BLEU for text generation tasks.
Conclusion: Option B (BLEU) is the best metric for translation evaluation, offering a performant and standard approach, as endorsed by Databricks' guidance on generative tasks.

NEW QUESTION # 39
......

Knowledge of the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials contains is very comprehensive, not only have the function of online learning, also can help the user to leak fill a vacancy, let those who deal with qualification exam users can easily and efficient use of the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials. By visit our website, the user can obtain an experimental demonstration, free after the user experience can choose the most appropriate and most favorite Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials download. Users can not only learn new knowledge, can also apply theory into the actual problem, but also can leak fill a vacancy, can say such case selection is to meet, so to grasp the opportunity!

Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Notes: https://www.itexamguide.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate_braindumps.html

P.S. Free 2025 Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Itexamguide: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wZI3i5fnyW24nPlY9DhS3iCTJ91Hna8R

Max Shaw Max Shaw

Biography

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Examcollection Vce | Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Notes

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Notes | Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Forum

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q34-Q39):

Company

Resources

Legal

Contact us